Zionist occupied Britain rolls out red carpet for Zionist Peres

If anyone needed further proof about the British government's bias towards Israel, then this week provided the definitive answer.

Ritual Blood Sacrifice to Zion

On an official visit to Britain, Israeli President Shimon Peres was feted by the establishment as if he were a living saint.

On Tuesday morning Peres was given an honorary doctorate by Kings College at the prestigious Mansion House, right in the heart of London's financial district. Later the same day he addressed the world famous Oxford University.

Peres was given the rare honor of addressing both Houses of Parliament on Wednesday. And on Thursday he was awarded a knighthood by the Queen and met with Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

Believe me, this red carpet treatment was much more than most visiting dignitaries can expect when they come to London.

At the Mansion House speech especially, Peres was greeted as if he were Nelson Mandela. The audience turned a blind eye to his convoluted, long-winded rhetoric and laughed at his extremely lame jokes. They gave him a standing ovation when he entered the hall and when he exited it.

But all this begs the question: what has Peres done to deserve the accolades and the sycophancy?

Well, his supporters would argue that he is a former Nobel Peace Prize winner, and that his life embodies the rise of plucky little Israel to its current regional superpower status.

But the late Yasser Arafat, who embodied the Palestinian people in the same way as Peres does the Israelis, never received the same treatment from the British. And that fact did not go unnoticed by Israel's many detractors in the UK.

Of course those with long memories still call Peres “The Butcher of Qana”. This is a reference to the Israeli shelling of a United Nations compound in Lebanon in 1996.

One hundred and six civilians were killed in the strikes and more than 100 others were injured. All this happened on Shimon Peres's watch as Israeli prime minister. At the time he, and Israel, stood condemned.

But with the passage of time the world seems to have forgotten and now Peres is hailed as a “peacemaker”.

However, the message he delivered in the UK could not have been more controversial. He told anyone who wanted to listen that Iran wants to take over the entire Middle East and to subjugate it to extreme religious diktat.

He also implied that every Sunni in the region should be scared stiff of Shia Iran and sort them out.

It seemed like a blatant attempt to stoke the kind of sectarianism which has flourished following the invasion of Iraq and which now, thankfully, seems to be on the wane.

The government, the British establishment and probably even the Queen listened to the Peres line, probably thinking they were the words of some great sage.

But others did not show Peres the same kind of respect - despite the official plaudits the Israeli president could not escape the protests.

Students at Oxford University interrupted his speech and called him a “war criminal”. Pro-Palestinian protestors lobbied parliament, reminding the world that Peres recruited and armed the Haganah terrorist militias which led the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948.

They also hammered home the fact that Peres was the man behind Israel's nuclear arsenal - to this day the only one in the entire Middle East. And as president of Israel, they claimed he bears responsibility for the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, where 1.5 million Palestinians are currently under siege.

The double-standards are plain for many to see but it is useless to pretend that there is a simple disconnect between the British government and ordinary people regarding Israel.

The truth is that Israel does have its fair share of supporters among the British public, but it also has its fair share of detractors.

Nevertheless, this division is not reflected in the political establishment and the decision-makers who seem to overwhelmingly support the Zionist state and are doing everything they can to maintain its hegemony in the Middle East.

All this would be largely irrelevant if it were not for the fact that the UK is currently playing a central role in the Middle East peace negotiations, as a member of the international Quartet.

For peace to be achieved, many would argue, impartial mediators are needed. But those with eyes and ears will draw the inevitable conclusions from Shimon Peres's royal reception in the United Kingdom.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=76241&sectionid=3510303

Some people may need more proof:

Judaic Symbology Goes Belly Up
Whether or not the Khazar cryptocrats plan a special move in 2012, the year of the next Olympic games, they certainly couldn’t resist parading their criminal hegemony in the odd-looking Olympic logo unveiled on 4 June. For £400,000 they got exactly what they wanted from Jewish brand-consultancy firm Wolff Olins: a deniable emblem of their shibboleth “ZION” masquerading as the date 2012. To do this they used a distracting, grafitti-like typeface in which “2” can be read as either “Z” or “N”. They then went on to arrange the characters in a square so that they can be read either horizontally ("2012") or vertically ("ZION"). Those tempted to reject this interpretation should ask themselves whether a more rational explanation can be found for an otherwise inexplicably feeble logo.

However, the cryptocrats badly miscalculated. So focused were they on their finely-balanced act of deception – one that would defeat the observational powers of the conspiracy-illiterate whilst at the same time satisfying the conspiratorial symbologists – that they completely overlooked the hue and outcry that would erupt from uncomprehending Londoners aghast that such an opportunity to advertise their pride in their city had been squandered in a childish design which (as Education Secretary Alan Johnson so humorously quipped) is reminiscent of "Boris Johnson's hair"!

No doubt we will enjoy the nonsense expended in the new logo's defence by the Crytpocrats' minions. However, this statement from Tony Blair is truly sinister: "When people see the new brand, we want them to be inspired to make a positive change in their life." Now this, far from being prime-ministerial twaddle, is a coded way of saying that he hopes the logo will help people to become (on a subconscious level at least) as open to Zionist domination as he (being a top-ranking freemason) is himself. Catholic Voice

British Prime Minister Adopts NAZI Symbol

Israel Founded on Nazi Forgeries